The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Dutch DPA) clarifies the concept “large scale” for the Data Protection Officer (DPO)

 In Privacy

Government agencies and public organisations have the obligation to appoint a DPA, regardless the type of data they process. Organisations whose core activities include following individuals or mapping them out “on a large scale” also have to do so. Furthermore, organisations have to appoint a DPA when they process, as their core activity, special personal data “on a large scale”. Special personal data are data concerning, for example, an individual’s health, race, political beliefs, religious beliefs or criminal record.

The Dutch DPA has now clarified the concept “large scale” in the context of care providers, as apparent from a press release dated 11 December 2018.

The Dutch DPA always interprets the processing of personal data by hospitals, out-of-hours GP services and health care groups as large scale processing. For all other care providers, the Dutch DPA considers processing as large scale processing if the relevant practice or health care institution has more than 10,000 registered patients or if it treats an average of more than 10,000 patients per year and the data of these patients have been stored in one single information system.

The processing of personal data by pharmacists is seen as large scale processing by the Dutch DPA because pharmacists serve, on average, large numbers of patients and exchange data with many other care providers when treating these patients. However, if fewer than 10,000 data subjects have been registered in the pharmacist’s system, the Dutch DPA does not consider this to be large scale processing – as in the case of other care providers. Thus, the Dutch DPA qualifies its earlier point of view on pharmacists following discussions with the KNMP (the Royal Dutch Society for the Advancement of Pharmacy), the trade association for pharmacists.

Nevertheless, the Dutch DPA recommends that care providers that do not process data on a large scale should also appoint a DPO, whether on a full-time or a part-time basis.
We will be pleased to help you with this issue.

Recent Posts
  • 11 May 2021

    INPLP article May 11, 2021

    Wouter Huisman
    Bob Cordemeyer
    Fine of €475,000 for reporting data breach 22 days to late. According to a press release of April 6 the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens) imposed a €475,000 fine on because the company took too long to report a data breach to the DPA into compliance with Article 33 GDPR.
    Read More
  • 15 September 2020

    The British Data Protection Authority ICO considers operating systems that are no longer supported inadequate security.

    Bob Cordemeyer
    If systems such as Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 are no longer supported by Microsoft, this may result in inadequate security, which could then be seen as an infringement of article 32 GDPR. Huge GDPR fines may be imposed because of this infringement.
    Read More
  • 17 March 2020

    Hanneke Slager
    Following the recent developments in connection with the Coronavirus (COVID-19), we hereby inform you of the measures that we have taken to ensure the continuity and quality of the services we provide to you.
    Read More

Leave a Comment