The British Data Protection Authority ICO considers operating systems that are no longer supported inadequate security

 In Privacy

If systems such as Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 are no longer supported by Microsoft, this may result in inadequate security, which could then be seen as an infringement of article 32 GDPR. Huge GDPR fines may be imposed because of this infringement.

In two data breach cases, Cathay Pacific Airways (10-02-2020) and DSG Retail (9-1-2020), the British Data Protection Authority ICO found that unsupported operating systems offered inadequate security as meant in article 32 GDPR. Based on pre-GDPR legislation in the UK, both companies were fined to the maximum amount of 500,000 GBP. Not only security measures were inadequate, the patch management was inadequate as well; moreover, forensic evidence was not available, backups had not been encrypted, network segregation turned out to be insufficient, software outdated and mismanaged, etc.

Under the GDPR, the fines are actually expected to be much higher in such cases. Using systems and software that are no longer updated is a serious security issue for a large number of companies.

Microsoft, for example, released its final public security updates for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 on 14 January 2020, thereby ending support for the operating system after more than 10 years.

Almost 40 per cent of the market still uses Windows 7. Until January 2023, organizations can purchase Windows 7 Extended Security Updates (ESU). The German government alone has paid approximately 887,000 USD to keep its pcs updated. Some time ago, Microsoft issued public patches for Window XP to prevent randsomware attacks. Microsoft will probably provide this kind of support for Windows 7 as well.

The decision of the British Data Protection Authority ICO is a serious warning to keep systems updated to such an extent that they meet the state of the art.

 

 

Recent Posts
  • 2 juni 2026

    We noemen het HaaS, want dan is het geen HuuR. Of toch wel..?

    Hanneke Slager
    Hardware als dienst HaaS (hardware as a service) en varianten daarop, zoals DaaS (device as a service), zijn populaire vormen van het beschikbaar stellen van hardware. Van zware servers tot laptops, tablets, smart phones, netwerkapparatuur en PC’s en alle andere IT “spullenboel” daartussenin (ik noem dat hierna gemakshalve allemaal “hardware”). Met “as a service” wordt
    Read More
  • 28 april 2026

    Nieuwsbrief april 2026

    Hanneke Slager
    Woord vooraf  De laatste tijd zien we veel nieuwe ontwikkelingen die impact hebben op de IT-sector. Er is in korte tijd veel nieuwe wetgeving gekomen en we zien een toenemende dreiging van cyberaanvallen, waarbij hackers steeds geraffineerder te werk gaan en maximaal gebruik maken van de mens als ‘zwakste schakel’. Als gevolg hiervan hebben we
    Read More
  • 14 april 2026

    De zorgplicht van de IT-leverancier onder de loep: het vervolg bij de Hoge Raad

    Joar Spangenberg
    Op 13 maart 2026 heeft de Hoge Raad arrest gewezen in de zaak GAC/Verano c.s. De Hoge Raad verwerpt alle cassatieklachten van GAC, waarmee het oordeel van het Hof ’s-Hertogenbosch definitief in stand blijft. Een relevante uitspraak voor de IT-praktijk. Wat was de kern van de zaak? Het geschil draaide om de implementatie van een
    Read More

Leave a Comment

Top