440,000 EUR fine for Dutch hospital OLVG for access by unauthorized personnel to medical records

 In Privacy

On 11 February 2021 the Dutch Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of EUR 440.000, = on Amsterdam hospital OLVG for having no sufficient measures in place to prevent access to medical records by unauthorized personnel and therefore infringing article 32 (1) GDPR.

An investigation was started after the DPA received several complaints of potential violations.

The DPA concluded that OLVG systematically failed to adequately safeguard access to medical records and identified violations with regard to (1) authentication and (2) verification of logging.

Two-factor authentication was only implemented to log on from outside of OLVG’s network and personnel could stil have access within the OLVG network by using a username and password, which provided immediate access to all medical records. “Single Sign-On” appeared to be enabled making this full access possible.

The hospital stated moreover wrongly to be compliant with the applicable NEN standards in its privacy policy.

Hospitals are obliged to check which medical files have been consulted by whom and to check the logging on a regular basis, in order to be able to identify unauthorized access and to take measures accordingly. OLVG did not check and verify the logging often enough to the opinion of the Dutch DPA.

During the investigations of the DPA, OLVG implemented additional security measures, including two-factor authentication within its network and monitoring of logging on a structural basis.

However, the Dutch DPA concluded that OLVG violated Article 32(1) of the GDPR by failing to comply with the requirements for two-factor authentication and regular monitoring of logging for almost a year from May 2018, with a fine of EUR 440.000, = as result. OLVG declared not to appeal this decision.

The first fine (EUR 460.000, =) under the GDPR imposed by the Dutch DPA on July 19, 2019 was also for a hospital the Dutch Haga Hospital for having an insufficient internal security of patient records and no proper two-factor authentication and control of logging in place as well. That case was even worse because personnel was leaking medical information of a Dutch celebrity to the press which came into the ears of the DPA.

How sad is it that public financed hospitals are paying fines to be used for health care.

Recent Posts
  • 2 juni 2026

    We noemen het HaaS, want dan is het geen HuuR. Of toch wel..?

    Hanneke Slager
    Hardware als dienst HaaS (hardware as a service) en varianten daarop, zoals DaaS (device as a service), zijn populaire vormen van het beschikbaar stellen van hardware. Van zware servers tot laptops, tablets, smart phones, netwerkapparatuur en PC’s en alle andere IT “spullenboel” daartussenin (ik noem dat hierna gemakshalve allemaal “hardware”). Met “as a service” wordt
    Read More
  • 28 april 2026

    Nieuwsbrief april 2026

    Hanneke Slager
    Woord vooraf  De laatste tijd zien we veel nieuwe ontwikkelingen die impact hebben op de IT-sector. Er is in korte tijd veel nieuwe wetgeving gekomen en we zien een toenemende dreiging van cyberaanvallen, waarbij hackers steeds geraffineerder te werk gaan en maximaal gebruik maken van de mens als ‘zwakste schakel’. Als gevolg hiervan hebben we
    Read More
  • 14 april 2026

    De zorgplicht van de IT-leverancier onder de loep: het vervolg bij de Hoge Raad

    Joar Spangenberg
    Op 13 maart 2026 heeft de Hoge Raad arrest gewezen in de zaak GAC/Verano c.s. De Hoge Raad verwerpt alle cassatieklachten van GAC, waarmee het oordeel van het Hof ’s-Hertogenbosch definitief in stand blijft. Een relevante uitspraak voor de IT-praktijk. Wat was de kern van de zaak? Het geschil draaide om de implementatie van een
    Read More

Leave a Comment

Top